9400GT graphics cards and compare 9500GS 2600PRO

1.9400GT and 9500GS Comparative
2.9400GT and 2600PRO comparison
3.9500GS and 2600PRO comparison
Thank you.
Satisfied with the answers to the points.
Who can provide the authority of the graphics performance of this ranking? Desktop Machine.That will be updated.Is that all have the basic graphics.+ + Points

9400GT and the actual 9500PRO Performance almost
94 and 95 and should be close to the performance 2600PRO, which is among almost all low-end graphics cards are too many for the first thread
not mean much
now the mainstream position should be equal to 3850 9600GSO less than 9600GT = 3870 less than the 9800GT is less than 4850 = 9800GTX + less than 4780 = GT260 less than the GT280 is less than 4870X2 http://www.pcpop.com/doc/0/285/285498.shtml
9500GS 4678 At

http://vga.intozgc.com/133/133194_24.html
2600PRO maximum 4471 points

(http://www.tomshardware.com/cn/439, news-439.html), please copy all the brackets
last 9400GT 3388 at

concluded:The show is the point of view 9500GS 4678 “2600PRO 4471” 9400GT 3388
test platform, but different is the 9500GS E6600 2.4G 2600PRO is E6300 1.83G
test and the 9400GT is the quad-core Q9650 3G
therefore concluded that the best 2600PRO than 9400GT is greater than the worst 2600PRO (3200 points) than the 9400GT

back-up reference
http://img8.zol.com.cn/bbs/upload/1160/1159216.jpg