Why are most if not all Linux distros free?

I just don’t tumble.How can certainly something this works competitive with Ubuntu, that distro I am running, be free Why don’tyou charge individuals for something like this It is mind boggling.All this COST-FREE software, OS’, better security.never get me personally wrong, I love that it really is free, but men and women pay any arm and a leg regarding propriety computer software (I know, I handed down a Windows Network with work), they fork out yearly membership fees to firewall companies and much more money about anti-virus software.

I know Red Ushanka and SUSE you should pay with regard to, but even the cost-free distros are in the same way good.Why possibly not charge people for all this free of charge stuff

Information needs to be free which is the opinion of your lot folks in the web.If ones neighbour wanted help would you charge him Those who help for nothing might just obtain warm fluffy feeling to get help nevertheless for these that can not be bought.

Or you can look from it from another point of view.What about those who can’t have the funds for it Do not they deserve a chance and therefore use something that many of us take to get granted

“Why not charge people for all this free of charge stuff”
Because life isn’t just about cash…For a lot of people at lowest.:D

Linux’s developer, Linus Torvald, released that Linux Kernel towards world, with the stipulation who’s would often be free, with the exception connected with proprietary private Distros, much like the apps you mentioned.In addition to, it’s serviced, and improved upon, with what of a large number of volunteers, in addition to corporate sponsors, while nonetheless under Linus’s special control.

FYI:That free versions of Reddish colored Hat, in addition to SUSE, are classified as Fedora in addition to OpenSUSE.

“Why not charge people for all this free of charge stuff”

Linus chose to perform things HIS / HER way, NOT Microsoft’s approach.And, everything is an improved place, as a consequence of him in addition to his AFFILIATE INTERNET MARKETING.More details:

They tend to be free because that was the original idea lurking behind Linux.They are in most cases open supply platforms this anyone can contribute to and boost.

Red Hat is not free because doing so is node grade software which has a support team.OpenSUSE is actually free.

I consider you this its odd more and more people are happy to pay out hundreds for an OS (MS, Apple).

There is often a large group of people who believe that all information needs to be free and there must be no copyright as well as copy security.The better minded of these create available source software program and maintain and distribute it for nothing, giving up their very own copyright.The nasty minded in the group believe that hacking straight into records as well as making trojans and Trojans to perform damage or simply writing packages to separate protection is ideal so they while others can useless the copyrights associated with game, songs, video, in addition to program writers.

for one particular, linux offers about 1-2% in the market share of all computers on the earth.why charge to the which is meant that they are free, to be a great replacement for a universe dominated through windows, and perhaps mac

mark shuttleworth (made ubuntu) is still on the list of few primary people to go into area commercially:)

Most in the major Linux distros.for example Ubuntu recieve donations

http://www.ubuntu.com/community/get-involved/donate

http://www.linuxmint.com/donors.php

http://www.linuxfoundation.org/participate/linux-donate

Carry.

because it’s “open source” which is amazing tumble with home wine and you have a windows software runner for nothing:-).